Skip to main content

How Great Thou Art?? What Do You Think?


  1. While the sound of screaming heavy metal is as offensive to my ears as the sound of two people I love yelling at each other, I have become very aware of a world, intertwined at one time with my own, where the lost children of this generation drift down a sewage filled existence. Cutting themselves, drugging themselves, drinking as much poison as they can keep down, infecting each other with sexually transmitted diseases, murdering their offspring, brutalizing each other in barbaric ways, and in general, trying to find ways to cope with the pain of living, they wander through a Godless vacuum of domestic violence, divorce, abandonment, drug/alcohol induced poverty, racism, and ignorance. They live in a world without beauty, without hope, victims of sins against them and yet criminals in their own rejection of and rebellion against God and all He done to help them. At least this song, done in this fashion, might bring a lost human soul to the idea that there is a great and mighty God, The Creator, who is indeed real and worthy of THEIR worship and who has provided a way to have the condemnation of THEIR sin against Him removed and who mercifully makes the condemned stop loving the sewer and fills the dead heart with love for the Savior. It's hard to say that this version of "How Great Thou Art" is acceptable, but I cry out that God would reach these broken, hellish children with His grace. Maybe this song might do just that. Since this song was written in honor of God, and to worship Him, I personally can't imagine anyone worshiping God while screaming. However, the fact that someone took the time to produce it and put it on the internet makes me wonder, and to pray, that God will awaken a dead soul, while listening to it, to His greatness.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. Can't believe I missed this comment. very sorry. Yes, as odd as this version is, it may just reach some broken hearts. To that we pray.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Andy Stanley and the “NEW Hermeneutic”

The problem of faith and reason is longstanding in the history of theology. Augustine held that faith aids reason (credo ut intelligam) and that reason aids faith (intelligo un creadam). The church father is, however, inclined to stress the later over the former. It was with Thomas Aquinas, and his Summa Theologica, that the effort to reconcile faith and reason reached its apex. Rejecting the medieval doctrine of double truth, he placed natural reason prior to faith in effectively every area of the Christian life. The restrictions are the mysteries of the faith that reason cannot penetrate.
Thomas’ affirmation of the high role of native reason in Christian belief is linked to his stress on dialectical method in study, seminally set forth by Peter Abelard. The form of study is dependent largely on logic to argue both sides of a theological question. Christian belief is thus the proper result of process or synthesis. Faith then assents to the final proposition arrived at by reason.

Pat Robertson is Warned!

Pat Robertson is taking it on the chin again. Seems each time he opines on why bad things happen to us, there is someone to call him on it.
Most recently, Dr. Richard Mouw has taken up the challenge in response to Robertson's recent statement on the Las Vegas shooting, in which at least 59 people were killed and more than 500 were wounded in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.
In a piece, titled, "You've Been Warned, PatRobertson!" Mouw, for whom I have deep respect, pens,

"It didn’t take long for some preachers to start telling us why God caused the horrible mass murder in Las Vegas to happen. Pat Robertson led the way, declaring that it was divine retribution for the widespread 'disrespect' for Donald Trump in America."
If Robertson had limited his rationale for the Vegas shooting to God punishing us for people dissing the President, I'd be smacking him on the chin myself. But he didn't.
Robertson's brief remarks f…

Is Our Knowledge of God Analogical of Univocal?

As a matter of first principles in apologetics, we can ask, “What does the unbeliever know about God?” However, the biblical apologetic is shaped not only by what Scripture says the unbeliever knows, but also by what it reveals he can know; is capable of knowing, as a believer. So we might also ask, “Is it our hope that the unbeliever can know God as God knows himself or that he can know God reflectively, in a creaturely way?” This is the univocal/analogical problem in Christian epistemology. 

The question arises in the context of the structure of human thought. It bears its own unique dilemma. If we stress too excessively that knowledge of God is univocal we run the risk of lowering the incomprehensible God to the level of the finite and make God as one of us. But if we stress too emphatically knowledge of God per analogiam we may very well deprive God of all likeness to the humanity he has created with the result that all we are left with is a barren, abstraction.

To a considerable…